Learning from the Blockbuster Failure

http://mobile.forbes.com/device/article.php?CALL_URL=http://www.forbes.com/2010/03/21/blockbuster-bankruptcy-economics-opinions-columnists-john-tamny.html?

Sent from my iPhone

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

Harmony for Google Docs | Harmony

OneLogin: Enterprise-Class Security Services and OpenID For The Small and Medium Sized Business - ReadWriteEnterprise

In re Robinson v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 08-14991

In re Robinson v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 08-14991

Issued February 8, 2010

Heard in U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals

Summary In an employment discrimination action brought by plaintiff during her Chapter 13 proceedings, summary judgment for defendant on the ground of judicial estoppel is affirmed where plaintiff failed to disclose her employment discrimination suit to the bankruptcy court, and thus took inconsistent positions under oath with the intent of misleading the court.

Source: FindLaw.com

In re TransTexas Gas Corp, 08-41128

In re TransTexas Gas Corp, 08-41128

Issued February 10, 2010

Heard in U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals

Summary In two related cases involving a bankrupt corporate debtor, rulings rejecting (i) a claim by corporate debtor's former CEO that the severance payments he received from the company were not fraudulent transfers, and (ii) a claim by a trustee in a related matter that the estate was covered under a policy issued by appellee-insurer, are affirmed where: 1) the severance payments made to the CEO after his dismissal were obligations incurred by debtor within two years of its petition date and thus constituted fraudulent transfers; 2) debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value for the payments to the CEO; and 3) the CEO's repayment of the amounts received did not constitute an insurable "Loss" under the insurance policy.

Source: FindLaw.com

03-13 Getting the Most from Google Voice

Chrometa gets Thumbs Up from WebWorkerDaily

Recently WebWorkerDaily reviewed time and billing app (and Practicehacker sponsor) Chrometa here http://webworkerdaily.com/2010/03/09/effortless-time-tracking-with-chrometa/ and gave it rave reviews. But that's no surprise. WWD had this to say about the program

Most time tracking and management applications require some up front work before you can roll with them, but not Windows app Chrometa. This utility starts working for you as soon as you install it. Running in the background, Chrometa tracks all your computing activities including emails, visits to web sites and open applications. It sorts the activities by application or tool and does it all without you needing to do a thing.

But I've known that since I became an alpha tester and true believer in Chrometa last year. I guess the only surprise is that it took this long for the web-based media to "get" Chrometa. Now that they've caught up, I wish the Chrometa crew even more success in the future. Go get 'em guys.

Posted via email from practice (redux)

Google Public Data Visualizer

For the last time ... you are a debt relief agency (get over it)

From the Bankruptcy Litigation Blog written by my colleague Steve Jakubowski comes thsi observation regarding today's Supreme Court decision in Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A., v. United States, No. 08-1119:

Back when bashing BAPCPA was in vogue I posited here that the BAPCPA's "debt relief agency" provisions "look more like an effort to create a consumer bankruptcy lawyer clone who much like the ever-multiplying Agent Smith from The Matrix-Reloaded speaks and does precisely as directed with ruthless efficiency."

Today's unanimous opinion from Justice Sonia Sotomayor (with concurrences from Justices Scalia and Thomas) tells us not to worry because while attorneys are "debt relief agents" under the Code, §526(a)(4) "prohibits a debt relief agency only from advising a debtor to incur more debt when the impelling reason for the advice is anticipation of bankruptcy." Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A., v. United States, No. 08-1119 (Op. at 13).

As with most bankruptcy decisions from the Supreme Court, the path taken to the holding is more interesting than the actual holding itself. This post examines two aspects of that road

<<read the rest of the post>>

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

Latest iPad Commercial

If you say you don't want one youre a liar.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDu9qfKpz44&hl=en&fs=1]


Sent from my iPhone

Posted via email from practice (redux)

Browser Wars

Client Calendar Upgrade (and how!)

Consumer spending is up... but wait!

The Bureau of Economic Anaylsis reported today that consumer spending went up by 0.5% in January.

Hey, that's good right? We know that a large part of GDP -- gross domestic product, basically the worth of a country-- is comprised of consumer expenditure.

But before we get all excited, the BEA also reports that personal income, on the other hand, went down by 0.1%.

Even worse? Disposable personal income -- the income we have left for necessities -- went down by 0.4 %.

Okay, so that's even worse than I thought. Uh-oh. Uh-oh indeed.

Miller v. LaSalle Bank (7th Cir.)

February 25, 2010, by

Amendment to Indiana recording statute applied to all mortgages, whenever filed. IC 32-21-4- 2(c) amends the Indiana recording act so that mortgages with certain technical defects are still considered to provide constructive notice. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the amended statute applied to all mortgages regardless of when they had filed. The statute's use of the phrase "is recorded" was ambiguous, the Court of Appeals found. Applying the statute retroactively would not upset vested substantive rights, as debtors did not have vested rights to the effect of technical defects at the time their mortgage was recorded. Importantly, the same legislative session enacted, within ten months, a subsequent amendment clarifying the subject amendment which stated that the subsection "applies regardless of when a mortgage was recorded."

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

IL, IND, Middle class, ch 13, ch 7,cir 7, creditor, current affairs,current-events, default,foreclosure, individual, legislation,modification, mortgage, property,real property, secured, state court

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Profits Up ... Employment to Follow (next Year)

February 25, 2010, by

Since 1980, employment has fallen after corporate profits have risen and vice versa. But there's about a one-year lag between the two trends. Gives a whole new meaning to the term lagging indicator.

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

 

Legalmatch: Find a Lawyer Free Legal Questions